Calories, protein, carbs, fat and a clear nutrition interpretation.
Use the tables to compare real options for your goal — values are per 100 g unless stated otherwise on the label.
Food
Nutrition facts
Calories, protein, carbs, fat and a clear nutrition interpretation.
Advertising
Reserved space for contextual ads.
Total foods
1
items analyzed
Best choice
Pork, ham escalope, cooked
Average protein
36,0 g
per 100g
Average carbs
0,0 g
per 100g
Average fat
—
per 100g
For nutrition facts, Pork, ham escalope, cooked per 100 g delivers 36g protein, 200 kcal, 0g carbs and — fat, plus 0g fiber.
Pork, ham escalope, cooked is a strong protein source (36g per 100 g) — useful for satiety, recovery and lean-mass goals when portion size is controlled.
For nutrition facts, Pork, ham escalope, cooked per 100 g delivers 36g protein, 200 kcal, 0g carbs and — fat, plus 0g fiber.
Pork, ham escalope, cooked is a strong protein source (36g per 100 g) — useful for satiety, recovery and lean-mass goals when portion size is controlled.
Pork, ham escalope, cooked stands out for protein (36g per 100 g) and often fits post-workout snacks, protein-forward breakfasts or lean meal add-ons.
Editorial angle: nutrition facts.
Numbers below are per 100 g. To decide whether Pork, ham escalope, cooked fits your routine, translate to your real portion (spoon, unit, scoop) and add the rest of the day.
Use Pork, ham escalope, cooked to hit protein targets when short on time — but add vegetables or slower carbs for a more complete meal.
Food
🔥 Calories: Calories show energy per 100 g and help you compare portion impact across foods. Use them with protein and carbs to see whether an option fits maintenance, deficit, or surplus goals. A low score does not mean a food is ‘bad’ — it reflects nutrient density for general health, not your specific plan.
💪 Protein: Protein per 100 g shows how concentrated a food is as a protein source. Higher values support muscle recovery, satiety, and meal balance when that is your priority. Compare foods on this page rather than judging a single macro in isolation.
🌾 Carbs: Carbs matter most in context: training days, ketogenic diets, and endurance goals change what ‘good’ looks like. Powders such as maltodextrin score lower on our general-health scale because they are energy-dense with little protein, fiber, or micronutrients — not because they are never useful.
🥑 Fat: Fat carries more than twice the calories per gram than protein or carbs, so small portion changes matter. Moderate fat levels can support hormones and absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Use this column with calories when balancing satiety and energy density.
The data shown is filtered to match this page’s topic.
The NutriDecide score (1–10) ranks foods on this page by protein, nutrient density, fiber, and a general-health lens — not by taste or whether they fit a specific diet. Low scores (e.g. maltodextrin) usually mean fewer nutrients per calorie; high scores (e.g. soy protein isolate) mean stronger protein and micronutrient density. It is a comparison tool: a low score does not forbid a food when it matches your goal.
| Food | Calories | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Fiber | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pork, ham escalope, cooked | 200,0 | 36,0 | 0,0 | — | 0,0 | 6/10 |
Food
Protein
High
Carbs
Low
Fat
Calories
Moderate
Summary
Decide better
For the nutrition facts angle, Pork, ham escalope, cooked offers this profile: Protein 36, Calories 200, Carbs 0.
It depends on portion, overall diet and your goal — use per 100 g numbers as a reference.
Look for foods in the same category with similar calories and macros and use NutriDecide comparison pages.
On this page, unless noted otherwise, main macros are per 100 g.
Advertising
Reserved space for contextual ads.
Guides connected to common nutrition goals and search intent.
Compare similar foods, alternatives and nutritional trade-offs.
Ranking, list and cluster pages that help search engines discover related topics.